Find
  • Jul 9

    The US could withdraw funding from the United Nations if its members decide to recognise and independent Palestinian state, a close ally of President Barack Obama has warned.

    Susan Rice, the American
    ambassador to the UN, said there was "no greater threat" to US
    support and funding of the UN than the prospect of Palestinian statehood
    being endorsed by member states.

    Mahmoud Abbas, president of the Palestinian
    authority, plans to ask the UN general assembly, which comprises all 192
    members, to vote on recognition at its annual meeting in New York in
    September.

    The US and Israel are pressing Mr Abbas to drop his plans. Mr Obama has
    strongly opposed the move, raising the prospect of a veto in the UN Security
    Council, which is expected to vote on a Palestinian statehood proposal in
    July.

    But Palestinian officials have spoken of their determination to a circumvent a
    US veto by deploying a rarely used Cold War mechanism known as "Uniting
    for Peace" under which a two-thirds majority in the General Assembly
    can override the Security Council.

    Although Palestinians believe they are close to securing such a majority, the
    General Assembly does not have the power to confer UN membership on a new
    Palestinian state, meaning that a successful vote would represent little
    more than a symbolic triumph.

    Even so, Republicans in the US Congress are promising to react aggressively to
    any approval of statehood. Two congressmen have already vowed to initiate
    bills to withdraw UN funding in the House of Representatives.

    Such a development could be devastating to the UN. The US provides almost a
    quarter of its $2.5 billion (f1.6 billion) annual budget, making a yearly
    contribution of almost $600 million (f375 million).

    Speaking at an event in Washington, Miss Rice said the Obama administration
    was devoting "extraordinary efforts and energy" to restarting
    middle-eastern peace talks so that a vote in September could be avoided.

    On the prospect of it being approved, she said: "This would be
    exceedingly politically damaging in our domestic context, as you can well
    imagine.

    "And I cannot frankly think of a greater threat to our ability to
    maintain financial and political support for the United Nations in Congress
    than such an outcome".

    A video of Miss Rice making the comments has been removed from the internet.

    Attempting to play down their significance, a spokesman for the ambassador
    said: "These were informal remarks in a domestic setting."

    The US is desperate to avoid being put into a position of having to wield its
    veto. With growing international support for Palestinian statehood, even in
    Europe, the US is looking increasingly isolated in its support for Israel
    and a veto would badly damage Mr Obama's credentials in a rapidly changing
    Middle East.

    But the president faces a politically damaging backlash from the pro-Israeli
    lobby and its many supporters in Congress if he does not block a resolution,
    a move that could also cost all-important Jewish votes in key swing states
    like Florida during next year's presidential election.

    Mr Obama has already angered the Israeli government and its US supporters by
    calling for a Palestinian state that roughly corresponds to the existing
    boundaries of the West Bank and Gaza, which Israel occupied after the Six
    Day war of 1967.

    The move was intended to rejuvenate the stalled Middle East peace process.

    But Palestinian officials, in public at least, say they remain committed to a
    UN vote as the only realistic way of breaking the deadlock.

    Western powers have backed a two-year Palestinian state-building programme
    that reaches fruition at the end of August. It has already been judged a
    success by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund and Palestinian
    officials say it would be hypocritical for the West to back the
    state-building exercise but not its "logical outcome".

    Britain has indicated that it would not join the US in vetoing Palestinian
    statehood in the Security Council. But David Cameron is also hoping to avert
    a highly divisive vote in the general assembly.

    "The question is whether we can do anything that might deflect the
    Palestinians from going ahead with this," a British diplomatic source
    said.

    Some Palestinian officials have conceded in private that they do not want to
    fall out with Mr Obama and are working on ways to resume peace talks with
    Israel and postpone a statehood vote.